About Me

I am an Aerospace Engineer with specialties in flutter, fluid structure interactions, and the use of CFD in a production environment. My dissertation shows how to improve the state-of-the-art unsteady CFD performance by 2 orders of magnitude. I am an engineer, a pilot, a marksman, a husband, and a dad.
Showing posts with label design. Show all posts
Showing posts with label design. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Aero-engineer: Off the ground

How can I get my aerospace engineering interest off the ground?

Recently, a mechanical engineering student asked this question in response to an advertisement at http://aerofluids.com/ARPL/. He wants to make a career shift right out of undergraduate engineering school. This student needs to become proficient in aircraft design in 2 years. He must formulate a plan and stick to it religiously.

Time and Money: Your time is far more valuable than you think. Since the timeline is 2 years, you must obtain the fundamentals fast; your training will be steep and expensive. Your competitors may have spent the last 10 years studying, building, flying and discussing aircraft. Their experiences will initially help them find better solutions faster. Your primary advantage is dedication and more efficient learning. If you can trade money for time, take it.

Reference Books: You must understand and recall considerable technical information. The fundamentals are contained in textbooks and reference books. You don't need to buy the newest editions. Solve the problems. Start with these:
  1. Funamentals of Aerodynamics, Anderson
  2. Hoerners Lift and Drag
  3. Theory of Wing Sections, Abott and von Doenhoff
  4. Aircraft Design, Raymer
  5. Any flight dynamics book by Roskam
  6. Boundary Layer Theory, Schlichting (older/used editions are ok)
For a quick high-level overview of an entire aircraft, study the Modern Fighting Aircraft line of books (example: MFA: Falcon and MFA: A-10)

Technical Journals: The aerospace journals contain practical and theoretical design cases. Set aside a couple of hours per week to systematically read journals. Look up the unfamiliar concepts in an aerodynamics book (e.g. Anderson). Start with these journals:
  1. AIAA Journal of Aircraft (ISSN 1533-3868, FREE e-copy at UA library)
  2. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
  3. AIAA Journal
Computer Programming: While not strictly aerospace engineering, proficiency at programming is necessary for analysis and visualization. You should be comfortable with Fortran and C for high performance computing. A scripting and plotting language such as Matlab, Python, Clojure, etc. is useful. If starting from scratch, try something like Think Python, HTDP or even SICP. For technical computing, try Numerical Recipes or NM (Hamming).

Projects: Work on projects continuously. Write-up your projects and publish the results on your professional blog.

Naturally, accepting a position in a design lab would accelerate this process.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

Divergent Trailing Edge

"Why does a divergent trailing edge airfoil work? Wouldn't this increase drag?" A colleague recently asked this question. Good question!

Divergent Trailing Edge Airfoil (Image from Patent US4858852 Fig.2)
First, we need understand the philosophy of use (application) for this type of airfoil: high subsonic and transonic aircraft designed for low drag about a specified lift coefficient: think long-range transport aircraft from the Boeing or Airbus families. Traditionally (since the 1960s), this application was served by supercritical airfoils such as the NASA SC(2) family.

Here's a quick discussion of three major reasons the concept works.

  • The divergent angles allows for an optimized lower-surface trailing-edge cusp to fill out the pressure profile without cusp separation bubbles. Result: lower Cd
  •  The divergent trailing edge tends to decrease the blunt trailing edge pressure. This decrease tends to promote less upper-surface boundary layer separation. Result: better Cdc, likely less AC shift
  • The mid-chord (say 60% to 80% chord) tends to be significantly thicker. This allows for more flexibility in flap geometry. Result: better low speed performance
McDonnell Douglas Aircraft patented this in 1989: Patent US4858852